KV Cache Memory Simulator: Users × Context → GiB
Exact KV cache arithmetic from your model's shape, with a concurrency slider against a memory bar that shows the moment the card runs out.
Fits, with 40.38 GiB to spare. This card tops out at about 57 concurrent full-length sequences before the cache alone exhausts it.
- KV bytes per token, per sequence
- 131,072 B
- …as a formula
- 2 × layers × kv heads × head dim × bytes
- One full 8,000-token sequence
- 1000.0 MiB
- × 16 users
- 15.63 GiB
- Model weights
- 16.00 GiB
- Runtime overhead
- 8.00 GiB
- Left for KV cache
- 56.00 GiB
- Maximum concurrent sequences
- 57
The memory nobody budgets for
Model weights are the number everyone knows and the KV cache is the number that decides capacity. Weights are fixed: load them once and they occupy the same bytes whether you serve one request or a hundred. The cache is per-sequence and per-token, so it scales with exactly the two quantities your product grows on — how many people are using it and how much context each of them has.
Drag the user count and the shape of the problem is immediate. A model whose weights comfortably fit becomes a model that cannot serve twenty people at long context, and no amount of weight quantisation fixes that, because you were never short of weight memory. What fixes it is fewer KV bytes per token: grouped-query attention, which is why the KV-head field is separate from the head count; an 8-bit KV cache, which halves the whole term; or simply shorter contexts, which is the lever people reach for last and which works linearly.
The per-token figure is worth internalising on its own. At 32 layers, 8 KV heads, head dimension 128 and two bytes, one token costs 128 KiB of cache — so a single 8,000-token conversation is a gigabyte. That is the sentence that explains why long-context serving is expensive in a way that per-token pricing does not: the provider is not just doing more arithmetic, they are holding a gigabyte of your conversation resident on a card that costs more per hour than most instances cost per day.
Prefix caching changes the economics but not this arithmetic — a shared prefix is stored once instead of per user, which is a large win precisely because the per-user number here is so large.